College football: What the BCS top 25 rankings would look like before Week 10
The BCS Top 25 it may be a thing of the past, but it still offers a fascinating glimpse of what could be and what may be ahead of it College Football Playoff.
Although the system was more than controversial during the time it was implemented, it provides a glimpse of what the rankings would have looked like during that era, which spanned from 1998 to 2013. Prior to the first publication of the playoff rankings of college football season, there’s never a better time to look to the past for inspiration for the future.
Here’s what the BCS Top 25 would look like before Week 10, via @BCSKnowHow on Twitter.
BCS Top 25 before Week 10:
- Georgia Bulldogs
- Ohio State Buckeyes
- Tennessee Volunteers
- Michigan Wolverines
- Clemson Tigers
- Alabama Crimson Tide
- TCU Horned Frogs
- Oregon ducks
- USC Trojans
- Ole Miss Rebels
- UCLA Bruins
- Utah Utes
- Kansas State Wildcats
- LSU Tigers
- Penn State Nittany Lions
- Illinois fighting Illini
- Oklahoma State Cowboys
- North Carolina Tar Heels
- Tulane Green Wave
- Wake Forest Demon Deacons
- NC State Wolfpack
- Syracuse orange
- Texas Longhorns
- Flames of Freedom
- Oregon State Beavers
Before the current CFP system, college football was governed by the BCS, whose final rankings were computer-generated, and two teams faced off for the national championship to conclude the season. The system also created matchups for four additional prestige bowl games: the Fiesta Bowl, Orange Bowl, Rose Bowl and Sugar Bowl.
The BCS formula used a number of factors to produce its list. There were three components to the ranking, with a mix of human and computer-generated thoughts: the Harris Poll, the Coaches Poll, and the Computer Ranking. The three parts were weighted equally.
The Harris and Coaches polls had values assigned to each place in reverse order. For example, in the 25-team Harris Poll, the top team receives 25 points, the second team receives 24 points, and so on. The Coaches Poll had a similar scoring system, although fewer voters were involved.
The third part, the computer ranking, included six additional polls: Anderson & Hester, Richard Billingsley, Colley Matrix, Kenneth Massey, USA Today by Jeff Sagarin and Peter Wolfe. At the end, the final values assigned to each team in the three categories are averaged and the BCS rankings are drawn up.
Beginning in 2014, the CFP replaced the BCS. Two semifinal games are played around New Year’s Day, and the games take place on a rotating basis in six of the nation’s top bowls: the Cotton Bowl, the Fiesta Bowl, the Orange Bowl, the Peach Bowl, the Rose Bowl and the Sugar Bowl. The two winners advance to the College Football Playoffs National Championship. This match is played on a Monday night in the second week of January.
The CFP selection process is more subjective than the BCS, as teams are decided by 13 people and there is no longer a strict computer component. The selection committee is made up of athletic directors, former coaches and student-athletes, and others from the world of college administration. The current chairman of the committee is Gary Barta, Iowa’s athletic director.
“The selection committee ranks teams based on members’ evaluation of the teams’ performance on the field, using conference championships won, strength of schedule, head-to-head results and comparison of results to common opponents to decide between teams that are comparable,” the web site he says
In addition, there is a governing council comprised of presidents and chancellors from the 10 FBS conferences plus Notre Dame that governs the administrative actions of the CFP.
College football remains the only college sport in the country without an officially sanctioned championship by the NCAA. At its core, the CFP is really a television contract currently owned by ESPN.
Ashton Pollard contributed to this article.
#College #football #BCS #top #rankings #Week